-
Closure of border crossings around Jerusalem after the attack sparks anger among neighboring village residents
The recent attack in Jerusalem led to strict Israeli measures, including closing all crossings surrounding the city. This has sparked a wave of anger and discontent among residents of nearby villages and towns. These residents feel they are bearing the brunt of armed groups' activities, despite having no direct involvement in these events.
The residents point out that closing the crossings cuts off their vital daily lifeline, as most rely on entering Jerusalem or passing through it for work, access to healthcare and education, or social communication with extended families inside the city. With these restrictions, they are forcibly isolated, which worsens their living conditions and increases economic and social pressures on them.
Some residents affirm that these collective punitive measures do not enhance security; rather, they foster feelings of anger and frustration and may produce counterproductive outcomes, increasing tensions in the region. They feel they are paying a personal price for actions beyond their control, as their daily lives are almost completely disrupted.
On the other hand, observers clarify that such policies could deepen the gap between Palestinians and official institutions, questioning the absence of solutions that could alleviate the impact of these measures or guarantee basic freedom of movement. Experts warn that prolonged closures could lead to humanitarian and social crises, especially since thousands of families depend on accessing Jerusalem for their livelihoods.
In contrast, Israeli authorities justify this step as a necessary measure to ensure security and prevent further attacks. However, local residents see it as a form of collective punishment that intensifies their suffering and deepens their sense of injustice.
As the closures continue, residents remain in a state of anticipation and concern, demanding the urgent reopening of crossings and the development of solutions that balance security needs with the rights of civilians to free movement and a decent life.
