-
Debate over “Loyalty to Killers” as Editor at Syria’s Official News Outlet Draws Criticism for Thanking Convicted Murderer
The conduct of individuals associated with Syria’s official media institutions has raised serious questions about the professional and ethical standards shaping the discourse surrounding these institutions. The controversy followed the discovery of a notable comment by Mohammad Ali, who identifies himself on his personal accounts as an “editorial supervisor” at Syria’s official news outlet, in which he expressed his thanks to convicted criminal Basel al-Hassan despite a final court ruling against him.
The incident, which has provoked widespread condemnation among followers, has raised questions about the gap between the official discourse that upholds judicial rulings and the personal positions of individuals who are presumed to represent official media institutions.
Basel al-Hassan was reportedly sentenced by the Syrian judiciary to 20 years in prison for his involvement in a series of crimes, most notably the killing of civilians in the coastal region in March 2025. Al-Hassan’s name was linked to a widely circulated video that purportedly showed him pursuing civilians and directly shooting one of them—footage that sparked shock and public outrage at the time.
Despite al-Hassan’s conviction, the “editorial supervisor” at Syria’s official news outlet commented on a post discussing the case and thanked the convicted man. The move was interpreted as implicit support for, or sympathy with, actions that are explicitly punishable under the law.
The comment sparked considerable debate, with observers describing it as a “blatant contradiction” that reflects a perceived weakness in the value system of some officials working in state media. While the state’s official discourse seeks to demonstrate the authority of the law and the fairness of the judiciary by highlighting prison sentences imposed on perpetrators, the individual conduct of an “editorial supervisor” appears to undermine that message and reinforce a culture of “impunity”—or even the celebration of individuals who have violated the law, so long as their views align with certain political orientations.
